<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Inside Out &#187; group discussion</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.totemdevelopment.co.uk/blog/tag/group-discussion/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.totemdevelopment.co.uk/blog</link>
	<description>A blog from Totem</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Apr 2013 11:05:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Reviewing Method : Verbs</title>
		<link>http://www.totemdevelopment.co.uk/blog/2011/02/reviewing-method-verbs/</link>
		<comments>http://www.totemdevelopment.co.uk/blog/2011/02/reviewing-method-verbs/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Feb 2011 15:53:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sam</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[For Trainers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Outdoor Development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[group discussion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[outdoor development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reflection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[story]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.totemdevelopment.co.uk/blog/?p=811</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A quick method for starting out a review (or reviving one that is stalling). Go around the room and ask people to tell the group all the verbs they have been doing today. e.g. Climbing, Canoeing, Swimming, Falling, Sliding, Catching, Carrying, Paddling, Shaking&#8230;. Alternatively, have them collect them on a flipchart, or white board. I [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.totemdevelopment.co.uk/blog/wp-content/uploads/2011/02/owl-studying.gif"><img class="size-medium wp-image-812 alignright" title="owl studying" src="http://www.totemdevelopment.co.uk/blog/wp-content/uploads/2011/02/owl-studying-287x300.gif" alt="" width="201" height="210" /></a>A quick method for starting out a review (or reviving one that is stalling). Go around the room and ask people to tell the group all the verbs they have been doing today.</p>
<p>e.g.</p>
<p><em>Climbing, Canoeing, Swimming, Falling, Sliding, Catching, Carrying, Paddling, Shaking&#8230;.</em></p>
<p>Alternatively, have them collect them on a flipchart, or white board.</p>
<p>I also find this useful in encouraging people to move from &#8220;task&#8221; to &#8220;process&#8221;, by guiding their thoughts towards the non-obvious verbs.</p>
<p>e.g.</p>
<p><em>Sharing, Arguing, Discussing, Leading, Learning, Helping, Supporting, Plotting, Scheming, etc</em></p>
<p>It&#8217;s a quick, lively, thought provoking exercise that can take on a life of it&#8217;s own!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.totemdevelopment.co.uk/blog/2011/02/reviewing-method-verbs/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Team Task: Poker Communication</title>
		<link>http://www.totemdevelopment.co.uk/blog/2009/08/team-task-poker-communication/</link>
		<comments>http://www.totemdevelopment.co.uk/blog/2009/08/team-task-poker-communication/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2009 15:40:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sam</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[For Trainers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Outdoor Development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[codes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[group discussion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[poker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[puzzle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reflection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[task]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[team]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[team dynamics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[teamwork]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[training]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.totemdevelopment.co.uk/blog/?p=175</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Takes 20-30 minutes Resources A set of poker chips. 200 in four colours works fine, the less you have in more limited colours, the harder the task will be. Instructions For Tutor Give the group a box of poker chips. Tell them &#8220;You have 20 minutes to create a means of transferring a message from [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Takes 20-30 minutes</p>
<h2>Resources<img class="alignright size-full wp-image-180" title="pokerchips" src="http://www.totemdevelopment.co.uk/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/08/pokerchips.jpg" alt="pokerchips" width="163" height="132" /></h2>
<p>A set of poker chips. 200 in four colours works fine, the less you have in more limited colours, the harder the task will be.</p>
<h2>Instructions For Tutor</h2>
<p>Give the group a box of poker chips. Tell them</p>
<p><strong>&#8220;You have 20 minutes to create a means of transferring a message from one half of the group to the other using only the chips placed on the table. </strong></p>
<p><strong>No paper or pencils are permitted.</strong></p>
<p><strong>After 20 minutes I will split the group in two and half of you will be asked to leave the room. I will give the remaining participants a 20-30 letter message that may involve letters or numbers but no punctuation, which you must pass to the other group using only the poker chips&#8221;</strong></p>
<p>Facilitate the creation of the code. This is where the bulk of the team dynamics and personal development takes place as the participants try to refine their aim, then develop the code and finally to ensure that everyoe understands the code.</p>
<p>Use whatever means you like to capture this discussion, we have successfully used video, notes, phrases used jotted on a blackboard and having observers taken from within the group.</p>
<p>When they have a code, split the group into two and send half out of the room. Give the other half a short (20-30 letter) message on a piece of paper and help them encode it.</p>
<p>The messages are best if they have several words, and aren&#8217;t too easy to guess once you have 2-3 of the words. We&#8217;ve used short Shakespeare quotes and the names of the building we are in.</p>
<p>Invite the other half back in to decode it and ensure that there is no  cheating.</p>
<p>Swap the two halves of the group over and try with a different message.</p>
<h2>Using it elsewhere</h2>
<p>We have used variants of this task in a number of places.</p>
<ul>
<li>On a beach with different coloured stones.</li>
<li>In a forest using sticks.</li>
<li>On a draughts (checkers) board using the pieces.</li>
<li>In a park using &#8220;whatever you can find&#8221;.</li>
<li>In a mountain campsite using &#8220;the contents of your rucksack&#8221;.</li>
</ul>
<p>Doing it outside makes it a much more physical, tactile task and adds whole new areas of discussion such as role allocation &#8220;You go and collect black stones&#8221; or even &#8220;What shall we use?&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.totemdevelopment.co.uk/blog/2009/08/team-task-poker-communication/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Fried Eggs and Group Discussions</title>
		<link>http://www.totemdevelopment.co.uk/blog/2009/06/fried-eggs-and-group-discussions/</link>
		<comments>http://www.totemdevelopment.co.uk/blog/2009/06/fried-eggs-and-group-discussions/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 15:09:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sam</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[For Leaders]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[For Managers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[For Trainers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fried egg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[group discussion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[team]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[team dynamics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[training]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.totemdevelopment.co.uk/blog/?p=47</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you watch any group discussion where more than 3-4 people are trying to achieve something, an interesting effect occurs. The group often start out with everyone contributing but after an initial period of politeness (Tuckman&#8217;s forming stage) the group begin to resemble a fried egg. Both physically and conceptually, people place themselves either in [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you watch any group discussion where more than 3-4 people are trying to achieve something, an interesting effect occurs. The group often start out with everyone contributing but after an initial period of politeness (Tuckman&#8217;s <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Forming-storming-norming-performing#Forming">forming stage</a>) the group begin to resemble a fried egg. Both physically and conceptually, people place themselves either in the yolk, the white, or outside the egg entirely.</p>
<p><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-43" title="fried_egg" src="http://www.totemdevelopment.co.uk/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/06/fried_egg.png" alt="fried_egg" width="446" height="393" /></p>
<p><span id="more-47"></span><img class="size-full wp-image-44 alignleft" title="greenstar" src="http://www.totemdevelopment.co.uk/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/06/greenstar.png" alt="greenstar" width="25" height="25" /> Green people are fully engaged in the discussion that&#8217;s is going on. They form the &#8216;yolk of the egg&#8217; They will be sat at the centre of the group, often with a piece of paper in their hand, contributing ideas, extracting ideas from other green people and attempting to solve the problem or formulate a plan.</p>
<p><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-45" title="orangestar" src="http://www.totemdevelopment.co.uk/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/06/orangestar.png" alt="orangestar" width="25" height="25" /> Orange people are following the discussion but they do not feel full engaged. They might have ideas but they won&#8217;t contribute them or, if they do, will not fight to make them accepted. People for whom the consequences of the discussion will have little effect often sit in this &#8216;white of the egg&#8217;. Also people who aren&#8217;t confident or who are overwhelmed by the green people will be here. They often have useful input to the conversation that will be missed unless they can be drawn into the &#8216;yolk&#8217; and become green people.</p>
<p><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-46" title="redstar" src="http://www.totemdevelopment.co.uk/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/06/redstar.png" alt="redstar" width="25" height="25" /> Red people are totally disengaged from the discussion. They are sat at the outskirts of the group, barely even following what is going on. They normally feel totally disconnected from the topic being discussed, either because they feel they can&#8217;t change the course of the discussion or because they have resigned themselves to going with whatever the group decide. They make no attempt to contribute and often feel bitter about being sidelined.</p>
<p>People don&#8217;t stay within one section of the egg but drift between them as the discussion goes on. The important thing as a chairman, facilitator or team manager is trying to stop people drifting outwards into the white or out of the egg entirely.</p>
<p>As a participant you can be aware that the tendancy is to look inwards towards the yolk and you can occasionally glance behind you and see if there are any orange or red people who can be brought back into the discussion.</p>
<p>So next time you are involved in a group discussion, have a think about where in the egg you sit and where the other participants are. You might be able to help bring people back to the yolk.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.totemdevelopment.co.uk/blog/2009/06/fried-eggs-and-group-discussions/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
